Showing posts with label Introduction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Introduction. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Following Judas: Introduction


1. Introduction

Judas Iscariot is one of the most fascinating and controversial figures in the Bible.  Though he is a central character in the gospel story, we know actually very little about him.  American Bible Scholar John P. Meier summarizes what we know like this, "We only know two basic facts about [Judas]: (1) Jesus chose him as one of the Twelve, and (2) he handed over Jesus to the Jerusalem authorities, thus precipitating Jesus' execution."

From the text that we have, we actually do know a little more.  We know he was an apostle of Jesus, we know he was the treasurer or purse keeper, and we know he betrayed Jesus.  We have two accounts regarding his death, but we know nothing about his life before becoming an apostle.    The Gospel of John names him as the son of Simon Iscariot, but we no nothing about the rest of his family.  Iscariot even adds more questions as it could refer to a location, a group of rebels, or an epithet.

Through the Synoptic Gospels, through prophecy, through the Apocrypha, through history, and through literature, we are painted many different pictures of an often conflicting image of Judas.  From enlightened to possessed, from zealot to coward.  We are led to believe that at least, for a time, Judas was an earnest apostle and devoted follower of Jesus Christ.  Which would seem to raise one ultimate question:

Why?

Why would he betray Jesus?  What would lead him there?

How could someone who had been empowered by Jesus to do such great things end up betraying him?

How can one so close be so far gone?

How can one be so close to Jesus, to God dwelling among His people, and still go astray?  How can someone betray everything about the one they seemed to devote their life toward?

Today, we use the name Judas as a synonym for betrayer.  We can see this throughout our literature and our language.  Bob Dylan would write about his being called Judas for switching to electric, "The most hated name in human history.  If you think you’ve been called a bad name, try and work your way out from under that."  And yet, it is simply the Greek form of Judah, a celebrated name in the Old Testament, a common name at the time in the New Testament, and one that means "God is praised."

I would argue that there are many of us today that continue to follow in Judas's footsteps.  That many are active in churches and ministries and would seem so close to God, but are in fact so far off the mark.  We're betraying him in a hundred variations of ways, and often without any thought or recognition.

This series over the coming days will explore the variations sources of information we have for Judas's life and motivations, as well as digging into theories that have been offered to explain that fundamental question.  In doing so, it will hopefully show us ways in which we are betraying Jesus in our own lives and how to combat those impulses.

Show us ways in which we too are Following Judas.

What follows is a series of blog posts exploring the texts we have on Judas and the interpretations that have come from it.  Through these, I think we can see several ways in which we all are, at times, following in Judas's footsteps.  So close, and yet so far.

Please note, while I have been researching these, I anticipate that there are things that I've overlooked.  I'm not sure if my research was extensive enough, as it always seemed to be uncovering new avenues to explore.  This is something I plan to keep tinkering with and adding additional information as I come across it.  It is presented now as a bit of a work in progress.  A rough draft of a thesis on how Judas could betray and why we do the same thing.

Please take it in the spirit of exploration and learning that it is offered.

Wednesday, October 3, 2018

If I Were Disney CEO Part 24 - Studio Entertainment (Film) Overview

As I transition between corporate units, from Parks and Resorts to Studio Entertainment, I wanted to preface the change with an overview post, similar to how I started the Parks and Resorts division.  The goal for this post is to outline overarching ideas and goals for the Studio Entertainment division as a whole and how that will impact decisions for each individual film studio.

Walt Disney Studios is currently the largest of the "Big 6," with 21.82% market share.  When the purchase of 20th Century Fox is finalized, the combined market share will jump to 34.74%, cementing Walt Disney Studios as the dominant player in Hollywood.  With a wide variety of studios under its belt, Disney literally has a studio for every demographic.  The challenge becomes ensuring that the studios as a unit are complementing and not competing with each other.  That becomes an issue of scheduling and purpose.  Scheduling is easier, purpose though can be elusive.

The overall strategy for Studio Entertainment will differ a little from Parks and Resorts, as there is more opportunity for acquisition, redevelopment, and rebranding in order to fully develop the studio's film slate.  Accordingly, I will be exploring all options.

As before, there are a few goals that carry through this division:
  • The primary goal is to cement each studio's unique identity.  To identify and finesse what makes a film from that studio. 
    • How does a Walt Disney Feature animation picture differ from a Pixar Animation feature and do we need both?  
    • What exactly is a Disney live action feature?  
    • What is a 20th Century Fox film?  
    • These basic questions must be answered and each studio must have a specific niche and purpose for existence.  Therefore, each entry in this portion of the series will have a specific thesis/purpose statement for the studio.
  • A secondary goal will be to identify additional studios that should be created or promoted to fill in gaps in the Disney theatrical film offering.  
    • Put another way, are there films that previously used to be "Disney" films that do not fit within the existing studio's mission statement.  
      • A prime example of this category of film would be the sports film.  Disney has a long history of sports stories, which do not clearly fit in with the existing studio structure.
  • A secondary goal is to bring useful storytelling tools and methods from the various studios and apply them to the whole unit as appropriate.
    • For example, it is my firm belief that each studio should have a chief creative head or heads and advocate(s), like a Kevin Fiege.  Someone who knows the ins and outs of that particular studio and what makes it unique and who is able to fiercely protect the studio from higher executives.  There are three studios that currently have such a setup, but others which are floundering because of a lack of a visionary in charge.
    • Further, the Pixar Braintrust is a great idea that should be implemented across most all studios.  It creates a structure where there will always be a baseline of quality in every Pixar film.  Some may soar higher than others, but the story itself will always work.
  • Finally, another main goal will be to flesh out ideas of particular films and franchises that each studio should be developing.
With that framework, the following studios will be discussed over the coming weeks.
This should give a little bit of a preview for some of the changes that I would implement and will serve as a continuing guidepost for the entries over the coming weeks.

As always, thank you for reading and continuing through this journey with me.